 |
On
Following One's Dreams
Donald A. Stewart, MA
As
a career, radiology offers its practitioners more opportunities
for professional and intellectual development thanany other
medical specialty-this was the case the first day after Roentgen's
discovery and continues to be the case today, current upheavals
in our health-care system not-withstanding Radiology residency
programs continue to be comprehensive in scope and content,
and residents have ample chances to explore the specialty's
diversity as they rotate through chest, breast, musculoskeletal,
gastrointestinal, and genitourinary radiology, pediatric radiology,
neuroradiology, and cardiovascular and interventional radiology.
During these rotations, they acquire skill in and knowledge
of state-of-the-art imaging technologies that allow explication
of disease processes and trauma-computed tomography (CT), ultrasonography
(US), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and spectroscopy, radiography,
and nuclear medicine-along with experience in interventional
procedures such as biopsy, drainage, angioplasty, embolization,
infusion, and percutaneous introduction techniques. Radiologic
physics, radiation biology and protection, and pathology are
also part of the program, as is exposure to computer technology
and information science. Radiology generates, evaluates, stores,
and retrieves more digital clinical information than any other
medical specialty, and adroit synthesis and management of information
has become central to the radiologist's daily work.
On
completion of their residencies and successful navigation of
their American Board of Radiology, or ABR, examinations, young
radiologists find themselves at the center of a conceptual
locomotive roundhouse where tracks diverge to every point on
the medical compass. These tracks can lead to specialization
in one or more organ systems or in pediatric radiology, neuroradiology,
or cardiovascular radiology; a focus on a specific imaging
modality (CT, MR, US, or nuclear medicine); a focus on hands-on
interventional treatment; a role in the management of information,
capital equipment, and ideas; a role in the teaching of others
in an academic setting; the research and development of diagnostic
imaging technology or new approaches to diagnosis; departmental
management; spectroscopic explication of disease processes;
the oversight and integration of image data with data generated
by hospital information systems, or HIS, and radiology information
systems, or RIS; or a career as a consummate general radiologist
at the forefront of primary care.
During
and after their residencies, radiologists have access to the
richest array of continuing education materials and programs
in all of medicine. Radiology's peer-reviewed publications
(more than 35 of them) and professional societies (more than
50 of them) produce ideas and knowledge that encompass all
facets of the specialty. The Radiological Society of North
America (RSNA) alone, with its educational materials, annual
scientific meeting, and stellar publications, offers a cornucopia
of educational opportunity and has structured its programming
so that all radiologists-no matter what their special interestshave
complete access to germane educational materials (print and
electronic) and a means of interacting with peers. RSNA's infoRAD
is a testament to radiology's leadership role in interactive
electronic education, and to the fact that radiologists are
front-runners in medical informatics, physicians who-in a true
sense-add value to any clinical enterprise they engage in.
As
we witnessed throughout the centennial celebration of Roentgen's
discovery, radiology's history is rich because there have always
been radiologists and allied scientists who have reveled in
the opportunities the specialty affords, individuals with vision,
passion, diverse interests, and the will and conviction to
walk new paths and follow their dreams. Typically, these individuals
are multitalented, inquisitive, driven to share their thoughts
with others, active in the stewardship of the specialty, and
optimistic about its continued growth. Are there many of these
individuals in radiology's ranks today? Of course there are,
and they are actively shaping the current chronicle of history
that will be scanned at radiology's next centennial. Some have
even reached beyond our discipline to play active roles in
multidisciplinary higher education.
William
R. Brody, MD, PhD, took his place as president of the Johns
Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md, on September 1, 1996, bringing
this institution the visions, skills, and ideas he has developed
throughout an active and exciting radiologic career. Inspired
by his father, an ophthalmologist, Brody crystallized his dreams
early in life and pursued a career that combined medicine and
technology, sure that this would lead down an exciting path.
A BS and MS in electrical engineering from the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, Cambridge, an MD and a PhD in electrical
engineering from Stanford University, Stanford, Calif, an internship
in cardiovascular surgery at Stanford, and a radiologic residency
at the University of California, San Francisco, form the bedrock
of his academic accomplishments.
Brody's
posts have included professor of radiology and electrical engineering
at Stanford, chief executive officer and founder of the Resonex
Corp, Freemont, Calif, radiologist-in-chief and Martin Donner
Professor and director, Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins
Hospital, chairman of the University-wide Committee for Education
in the 21st Century at Johns Hopkins, and-most recently-provost
of the University of Minnesota Academic Health Center, Minneapolis,
where he oversaw the well-being of all students, faculty, and
staff in seven health professions schools, including two medical
schools, and a major hospital and health system, managing a
budget of $750 million in the process.
Brody
has contributed more than 120scientific articles to the radiologic
and electrical engineering literature. His topics have ranged
from cardiovascular imaging to minimally invasive imaging,
MR imaging, and socioeconomic issues relevant to radiologic
education and research. He is a member of the Institute of
Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC,
a founding fellow of the American Institute of Medical and
Biological Engineering, Washington, DC, and a fellow of the
American College of Cardiology, Bethesda, Md, the American
College of Radiology, Reston, Va, and the Institute of Electriclal
and Electronic Engineers, New York, NY. He is 52 years old
and married with two children.
Brody
is excited about his new post at Johns Hopkins and sees this
institution as well positioned to address what is probably
the most critical issue facing higher education today (medical
and nonmedical alike): How to provide a highquality education,
with a strong research component, in an era of increasing competition
for resources. An advocate of radical change in medical education,
Brody's focus has been on the resolution of financial problems
that beset academic medical centers in an era of managed care.
He is a questioner and an examiner of educational paradigms.
What should a future classroom or campus ideally be? How should
medical curricula change? What are the most effective means
of educating physicians? How can medical specialties advance
their knowledge bases in the face of economic constraint and
aridity? In the face of intense competition for fewer research
dollars, Brody sees academic centers consolidating their efforts
and considers it likely that there will be fewer centers of
excellence to carry on the research effort.
Governmental
obliviousness notwithstanding, Brody believes members of the
public expect medical advances to continue and that they would
be shocked to learn that our push to expand the frontiers of
knowledge can only be diminished in an environment in which
everything physicians do-research included-must be justified
on the basis of cost or financial return. He cites the automobile
industry as an example. Although car manufacturers have become
more efficient in production and close down plants to stay
profitable, they would not dream of closing down their research
and development facilities; lack of improvements, better efficiency,
and safer operation would-over time-render their products obsolete
and unmarketable. Academic centers of excellence are medicine's
research and development facilities, and Brody views the threat
of closing down or denervating some as very real.
As
he did in 1990 (1), Brody still believes that the development
of a sound research program hinges, in large part, on the willingness
of departments to invest in people and facilities, investments
that are costly and involve risk but that must have a high
priority despite the pressures from managed care to generate
more and more revenue. Departments, however, cannot bear the
entire economic brunt, a state of affairs that some managed
care companies and government seem unconcerned about at this
stage of health care's evolution while the National Institutes
of Health, Bethesda, Md, will probably remain level in constant
dollars, with only a small share of these dollars awarded to
investigators in medical imaging.
The
technologies radiologists use to treat and diagnose disease
are also critical in the performance of research efforts, and
one can argue-as Brody does-that imaging technology has been
a stabilizing element in health-care delivery, not a cost center.
Only 4%-5% of health-care costs are due to radiology, and its
cost benefits are too huge to quantify. Even though there are
always ways to become more efficient, Brody believes that the
cost of the radiologic component in hospital budgets is a lower
percentage today than what it was 30 years ago.
Sales
of MR imagers were down almost 40% in 1996, an inordinate number
of freestanding imaging centers began to close (eg, in California
and Florida), and managed care is pushing for the performance
of fewer procedures at all centers and institutions that use
capitation as an incentive to do less. What the entire system
seems to be unable to do, says Brody, is steer a true course
between the Scylla of costly overutilization and the Charybdis
of doing less than clinically indicated so that patients can
navigate the channel with confidence and in good shape.
With
all the profound changes in our healthcare system, the physician's
increasing need to assume risk and live with uncertainty, the
threat to the physician-patient relationship that has worked
so well for so long, and the megaexplosion in information science,
will young radiologists continue to find a career in radiology
attractive or to find jobs? While Brody believes there will
be a softening in the job market in the years immediately ahead,
he offers some advice and countermeasures to those who see
only gloom and doom and obsess about current market forces
and the tedious motions of Adam Smith's unseen hand.
First,
a large number of currently practicing radiologists are older
than 50 years, and many are looking at early retirement or
changes in their career paths. Second, newly entering, multitalented
radiologists are bringing added value to the specialty with
new kinds of skills in addition to clinical ones (ie, computer,
informatics, business, legal, etc). Third, it is impossible
to know what the medicoeconomic environment will be in 2005,
a year when a resident who starts today will have completed
his or her residency and gained only a few years of clinical
experience. Can anyone really believe that our health system,
managed care, public expectations, diagnostic technology, innovative
spirit, and our combined knowledge base and expert use of that
knowledge base will remain static?
Brody
is as enthusiastic about the growth of that knowledge base
as he is about the progress in higher education, although he
worries that in our era more and more knowledge is being lost
in the clutter of too much information. Currently, he has as
much paper piled around his desk, home office, and bedroom
as the rest of us, but he sees a daynot too far away-when search
engines on the Internet will be far more efficient and programmable
than anyone can imagine-engines that we can program and teach
to retrieve relevant information automatically and display
it in an orderly sequence at a time we specify. As for the
important print journals in all scientific and medical disciplines,
he sees them continuing in tandem with cyberinformation-ensured
quality that you can carry around. Likewise, the big scientific
meetings will live on in spite of cyberspace. Only by chatting
in hallways with one's peers can one efficiently divine the
context of the overwhelming content and harvest the perceptions
of peers one admires and trusts.
I
asked Brody what he would to say to a young medical student
at Hopkins who evinced a genuine interest in the specialty
and wanted his advice. He replied, ". . . radiology certainly
is the most exciting medical specialty I know of. If you think
you will love this kind of work, follow your dreams, and work
hard; success will be sure to follow. There is always room
at the top."
With
every passing merger, buyout, administrative morass, and stockholder
demand for more profit, the humanistic voices of old are getting
harder and harder to hear. Although residents should not be
blind to events that affect their chosen career, they need
reminders about why they chose that career in the first place,
and confidence that they have the smarts, training, talent,
and societal mandate to succeed in a rapidly changing world.
If
one advances confidently in the direction of his dreams, and
endeavors to live the life which he has imagined, he will meet
with a success unexpected in common hours. He will put some
things behind, will pass an invisible boundary; new, universal,
and more liberal laws will be begin to establish themselves
around and within him; or the old laws will be expanded, and
interpreted in his favor in a more liberal sense, and he will
live with the license of a higher order of things (2).
The
radiologic community can be justly proud to see one of its
own assume so prestigious and visible an academic post, a post
in which he can foster the growth of all academic and medical
disciplines. We wish him the best and will watch his ideas
and dreams unfold with confident expectation.
References
1.
Brody WR. Academic radiology and research: a fresh approach.
Radiology 1990; 175:37-38.
2.
Thoreau HD. Walden Pond. In: Byam N, Gottesmann R, Holland
LB, et al, eds. The Norton Anthology of Literature. New York,
NY: Norton, 1989.
|